A satellite shows an overview of Fordow underground complex on June 22 in the aftermath of an overnight U.S. strike on the nuclear facility. Maxar Technologies/Handout/Reuters
On June 23, 2025, the United States launched “Operation Midnight Hammer,” an unprecedented military strike targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. This action involved more than 125 aircraft, notably stealth B-2 bombers deploying bunker-busting bombs, marking the largest-ever operational use of the B-2 in combat. This dramatic escalation followed a week of intensive Israeli operations against Iranian targets, transitioning the situation from regional proxy conflict to direct superpower confrontation.
Iran immediately denounced the attack, labeling it an act of aggression, threatening “everlasting consequences,” and marking American personnel in the region as legitimate targets. In a swift political response, Iran’s parliament overwhelmingly passed a resolution to close the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, pending final authorization from Supreme Leader Khamenei.
Investor Reactions: Surprising Stability Amidst Chaos
Contrary to historical market behaviors during periods of Middle Eastern geopolitical strife, global markets exhibited an unexpected reaction:
- The S&P 500 increased by 0.96% on June 23, 2025.
- NASDAQ similarly gained 0.94%.
- Israeli stocks surged to record highs, indicating investor confidence or strategic hedging against further volatility.
- Oil prices, typically expected to spike amid regional conflicts, reversed direction sharply after an initial surge, with the US Oil Fund (USO) closing down 8%, a significant recalibration by traders
.
Strait of Hormuz: Global Oil’s Achilles’ Heel
The Strait of Hormuz remains central to global energy security:
- Approximately 20% of worldwide oil supply passes daily through this chokepoint.
- Disruption, such as a closure initiated by Iran, would trigger severe global economic repercussions, potentially pushing oil prices above $100 per barrel.
Iran’s Strategic and Retaliatory Options
Iran retains several methods of retaliation, each with distinct global implications:
- Closure of the Strait of Hormuz: Immediate spike in oil prices and potential international military action.
- Proxy Attacks: Indirect escalation through regional allies such as Yemen’s Houthis or militias in Iraq.
- Maritime Disruption: Attacks on oil tankers or mining efforts in the Strait, disrupting global trade routes.
- Cyberattacks: Potentially devastating disruptions to Western or regional critical infrastructure.
- Diplomatic Pressures: Leveraging threats to gain geopolitical concessions without immediate escalation.
Historical Context: Oil Shocks and Economic Implications
Historically, Middle East oil disruptions have had substantial economic consequences:
- The 1973-74 oil embargo and the 1979 Iranian Revolution both led to significant global economic downturns.
- Despite current U.S. energy resilience due to shale production, a significant global oil shock would still severely impact global markets, particularly energy-dependent emerging economies.
The Fragile Ceasefire of June 24, 2025
On June 24, President Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, brokered with Qatari mediation. However, the initial hours of the ceasefire saw immediate challenges:
- Israel accused Iran of firing missiles into Israeli territory, resulting in casualties in Beersheba.
- Iran refuted the allegations, maintaining its adherence to the ceasefire and accusing Israel of continued aggression.
- President Trump publicly intervened, explicitly instructing Israel to cease military actions, stabilizing the situation momentarily but underscoring its volatility.
Market Reactions to the Ceasefire
Following the ceasefire declaration:
- Markets maintained their unexpected stability, signaling cautious optimism among investors.
- Traders, reassured by diplomatic intervention, continued recalibrating positions, reflected in sustained equity gains and controlled volatility in oil prices.
Strategic Scenario Planning: Three Potential Outcomes
Investors should prepare for multiple potential developments:
- De-escalation: Diplomatic efforts result in sustained compliance, market stabilization, and controlled oil prices. Although ideal, current dynamics render this least probable.
- Escalation: Renewed conflict through direct or indirect means, triggering market instability, elevated oil prices, and increased geopolitical risk.
- Internal Instability in Iran: External pressures may provoke internal shifts within Iran’s regime, introducing heightened unpredictability into global markets.
Investor Guidance Amidst Uncertainty
Given the unpredictable geopolitical climate, investors are advised to:
- Remain Vigilant: Continuously monitor geopolitical developments and market responses.
- Diversify Energy Investments: Guard against volatility and potential disruptions.
- Monitor Oil Prices Closely: Persistent increases above critical thresholds should prompt cautious reassessment of positions.
FAQs
- Will Iran close the Strait of Hormuz? While possible, this remains economically detrimental for Iran, likely provoking a significant international response.
- Why didn’t stocks decline significantly post-operation? Investors had already priced in significant risks, taking profits after initial volatility; optimism about containment persists.
- What are the implications of oil exceeding $100 per barrel? Such scenarios historically indicate broader economic downturns, increased inflation, and higher recession risks.
- Who faces the greatest risk from this conflict? Major Asian economies heavily reliant on Gulf oil, particularly China, Japan, and India, along with emerging markets lacking energy security.
Final Considerations
As “Operation Midnight Hammer” evolves into an uneasy ceasefire, the potential for rapid, unpredictable geopolitical developments remains high. Investors and global policymakers must navigate cautiously, continually adapting strategies to the dynamic Middle East landscape, recognizing the interconnectedness of geopolitical stability and global economic security.
Book a complimentary portfolio review with our team today – Book Now
At AWM, Our Fiduciary Duty Principles™ Define Our Commitment
Our Fiduciary Duty Principles™ reflect our dedication to transparency, ensuring that your goals remain our priority. Knowledge equips you with the tools to make strategic decisions and optimize financial outcomes.
How We Can Help You
At AWM, we provide personalized, comprehensive guidance for individuals and families. Our services offer peace of mind and confidence through every stage of your financial journey:
- Investment Management: Our globally diversified, tax-efficient portfolios are designed for resilience across market conditions.
- Proactive Tax Planning: We focus on tax-efficient strategies for both accumulation and distribution phases, helping you manage liabilities.
- Integrated Goals-Based Planning: Align all life goals into a unified financial plan to navigate transitions strategically.
Next Steps: Schedule Your Free Second Opinion Service Call
Contact AWM today to schedule a confidential consultation and connect with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals. For assistance, reach out to us at Service@awmfl.com.
Thank you for your continued trust and engagement.
Tony Gomes, Author, MBA
CEO and Founder
Advanced Wealth Management
Content Disclosure: The information here is general and educational. It is not a substitute for professional advice and does not constitute a recommendation. Forecasts and opinions are subject to change.
